<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Vasileios Vasileiadis — The Field Notes</title>
    <link>https://vvasileiadis.com/blog/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://vvasileiadis.com/blog/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Writing on marketing, strategy, and the work itself. Long-form essays on positioning, channels, measurement, and audience behavior.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>© Vasileios Vasileiadis</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 18:17:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>tools/build-feed.py</generator>
    <item>
      <title>The Complete Guide to Google Business Profile in 2026</title>
      <link>https://vvasileiadis.com/blog/google-business-profile-guide</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vvasileiadis.com/blog/google-business-profile-guide</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Local SEO</category>
      <description><![CDATA[Which settings, photos, and review replies actually change your local rankings — and which ones are a waste of an afternoon.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
        Most small businesses I work with treat Google Business Profile (GBP) as
        a one-time setup task. They fill it in, verify the address, and forget.
        Then they wonder why a competitor with a worse product ranks above them
        in the local pack.
      </p>

      <p>
        GBP is not a directory listing. It's a living surface that Google reads
        weekly. If you treat it like a website you maintain — posts, photos,
        reviews, Q&amp;A — it compounds. If you don't, it decays.
      </p>

      <h2>1. The settings that actually matter</h2>

      <p>
        Categories first. Your primary category is the single biggest ranking
        signal in GBP. "Restaurant" and "Italian restaurant" produce different
        results pages. Pick the most specific category that fits.
      </p>

      <h3>Secondary categories</h3>

      <p>
        Add up to nine secondary categories — but only if they're genuinely
        relevant. Adding "Caterer" because you occasionally cater dilutes your
        relevance for "Italian restaurant" searches.
      </p>

      <blockquote>
        Specificity beats coverage. One narrow primary category outranks ten
        broad secondaries every time.
      </blockquote>

      <h2>2. Photos: quantity, then quality</h2>

      <p>
        Google's algorithm rewards profiles with fresh, diverse photo uploads.
        Aim for one upload per week. Cover photo, interior, exterior, team,
        products, and "by owner" tagged shots all weight differently.
      </p>

      <h2>3. Reviews — the real ranking factor</h2>

      <p>
        Review velocity (how often new reviews come in) and recency matter more
        than total count. A profile with 40 reviews from the last 90 days
        outranks one with 200 reviews from three years ago. Build a workflow.
      </p>

      <p>
        For full setup, scripts, and a quarterly playbook — <a href="/contact">get in touch</a>.
      </p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://vvasileiadis.com/assets/img/blog2.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"/>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Meta Ads vs Google Ads: Which Should You Start With?</title>
      <link>https://vvasileiadis.com/blog/meta-ads-vs-google-ads</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vvasileiadis.com/blog/meta-ads-vs-google-ads</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Paid Advertising</category>
      <description><![CDATA[How to pick your first paid channel based on what you sell, who buys it, and how much you can spend. A decision framework, not a recommendation.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
        Every week a founder asks me: "Should I start with Google or Meta?" The
        honest answer is "it depends" — but the framework for deciding is
        simple, and most consultants overcomplicate it.
      </p>

      <h2>1. Start with intent</h2>

      <p>
        Google Ads captures existing demand. Someone types "plumber Reykjavík"
        and you appear. Meta Ads creates demand — it interrupts someone
        scrolling and convinces them they want what you sell.
      </p>

      <p>
        If people already search for your product, Google first. If they don't
        yet know they want it, Meta first.
      </p>

      <h2>2. Then look at price point and decision cycle</h2>

      <p>
        Higher price + longer consideration = harder to close on Meta from
        cold. Lower price + impulse-friendly = Meta can shine. A €1,500 sofa
        sells on Instagram. A €50,000 kitchen renovation sells on Google.
      </p>

      <blockquote>
        Pick the channel that matches where your buyer's head already is.
      </blockquote>

      <h2>3. Budget reality check</h2>

      <p>
        Below €1,000/month, pick one and run it well. Splitting €500 across
        both buys you noise on both. I'd rather see a tight Google Search
        campaign with €1,000 than a "balanced portfolio" that learns nothing.
      </p>

      <p>
        Want help picking? <a href="/get-proposal">Send me your details</a>
        and I'll come back with a recommendation in 48 hours.
      </p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://vvasileiadis.com/assets/img/image2.png" type="image/jpeg" length="0"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
